Сеќавање на еден идеалист
Самостојна изложба
Самостојна изложба
Славица Јанешлиева
„степен галерија”, културна локација „Место“, Скопје
24.10.2001
Текст: Небојша Вилиќ
КаталогPDF mk
Делото поставено во Националната галерија на Македонија во 2015.
Installation on display in 2015 at the National Gallery of Macedonia.
Text from catalogue (2001) by Nebojša Vilić:
In the current art events in
Macedonia covered with the notion "private narratives", the opus of
Slavica Janešlieva plays an important role. In accordance to her previous
projects, she continues the course of clearing her own past and the past of her
family, tending to introduce a different light in the attitude towards them.
But, this time the evocation of the
past is positioned outside the personal, or, more precisely, by way of posing
the problem of ideology, through her private discourse, Slavica Janešlieva gets
out of the domain of the general, that is, the public. The project
"Remembering an Idealist" contains an ambiguity that stems from the
duality of understanding "memory". In a sense, Janešlieva positions
the memory as her actualization of the idealist who, on his side, evokes his
own memories of some situations and events of his life. This actualization of
the ideological aspect of the actions of the "idealist" and his
memories of them opens the basic discourse of this project: the projectivity as
an objective and as its ending. An appropriate understanding of this
projectivity can be found in the definition of the notion of ideology developed
by Branislav Sarkanjac in his book "Ideology and Subjectivity", where
he distinguishes (and, therefore, defines precisely) the ideology to eidology
and ideelogy.
|
The extraordinary skillful connection that Janešlieva makes with this act
completely embraces the question of the relation of the ideology and the
subjectivity: the eidological (as a reflection of the reality) of the idealist
is transformed into ideelogical (as an influence of the ideas upon the world of
things) which Janešlieva lives through and ends with the ideological
"packed into complete works" (as a metaphor of a complete and
rounded, exhausted opus).
The portrait of the idealist is made of poppy seed and tautologically (maybe more precise would be to say semiogically) repeats his poem "Afion" where the projectivity is included in its full size. The ideological aspect of this projectivity is presented in the last, additionally written lines "But, the day will come...", but it is even more obvious in the pictorial - objective - textual diptych that refers to the burial of the texts and the copy of "Beli Mugri" with a personal dedication to the idealist. The fact that after the war the idealist could not find them becomes the teleological element of the projectivity. This aspect of the ideological shows its ideotelia. Or, as Sarkanjac states, "the ideotelia is inherent to the ideology as ideelogy, that is, it always offers (or forces to) a certain aim, the telos of the society (teleology), which is always in the future". By choosing this part of the memories of the idealist (the not-finding of the buried), Janešlieva expresses not only metaphorically and symbolically her attitude towards the ideology, but she also decisively defines it.
The portrait of the idealist is made of poppy seed and tautologically (maybe more precise would be to say semiogically) repeats his poem "Afion" where the projectivity is included in its full size. The ideological aspect of this projectivity is presented in the last, additionally written lines "But, the day will come...", but it is even more obvious in the pictorial - objective - textual diptych that refers to the burial of the texts and the copy of "Beli Mugri" with a personal dedication to the idealist. The fact that after the war the idealist could not find them becomes the teleological element of the projectivity. This aspect of the ideological shows its ideotelia. Or, as Sarkanjac states, "the ideotelia is inherent to the ideology as ideelogy, that is, it always offers (or forces to) a certain aim, the telos of the society (teleology), which is always in the future". By choosing this part of the memories of the idealist (the not-finding of the buried), Janešlieva expresses not only metaphorically and symbolically her attitude towards the ideology, but she also decisively defines it.
Therefore, the private experience of
Janešlieva of a certain ideology, an ideology she has experienced, is used for
the problem of the research to be raised or removed to a general level. The
transformation of the private into public, on its side, defines the duality of
this project as a duality where the private and the public completely surpass,
and therefore, neglect the private and its tabooing, but at the same time
remain as constituents of the project. So, the convictions of the idealist (no
matter how much ideologicized) in the necessity of representing and supporting
the Macedonian cause (as complete privacy), passes into the spheres of
establishing the critical discourse of Janešlieva towards her current reality.
The project is not in itself a critique of the referent ideology of the
idealist, but rather a critique of what is happening today with the results or
the achievements of its representing and supporting the cause.
This critique poses specific, yet
essential, questions of the relations with the social which, instead of the
militant - critical discourse towards the ideology and the idea of
projectivity, shows an estheticized critical discourse towards the social as an
exponent of the public. With that moment Janešlieva defines and fulfills the
meaning and the function of the engagement in the art and of the artists of
today - a meaning which implicitly demands having an attitude towards the
social reality.
Video stills from the video reconstruction.
No comments:
Post a Comment